Now if someone would take 10 mins to answer my question, wow I'd be happy!
The chances are that no-one has looked at DeviceHandler, or at least no-one who reads the forum, and that's why you have no replies.
I'm interested in the whole card utility thing, but am pretty busy and haven't had a chance to look at what DeviceHandler does (though I have downloaded it).
You will get more exposure if you post a question of this sort on #irc, or better on the mailing list (openzaurus-devel or angstrom probably)
Some links to the above:
http://openzaurus.org/wordpress/links/http://www.openembedded.org/contact (for irc details, then try #angstrom or #openzaurus)
http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/contactEven better would be to attempt to patch the current utility (I know you don't have a Zaurus atm, but you should be able to see whether the code compiles and submit a prelim patch/new app). If you simply want to ask whether it will be considered, then you need to explain exactly what is it and what the advantages of using it will be.
I want to report bugs (lots), but I am not going to report bugs if I get flamed by the devs for not placing it in the right bug tracker or some other nonsense. "You didn't read man 8 of $randompackage! RTFM! GCC isn't supposed to be able to compile executables out of the box! RTFM!" Your post ^ is a case in point.
Well report away, the only real guidelines are the usual ones: check that the bug isn't already present, and provide as much info/test cases/etc. as possible.
If your bug does exist, it will simply be closed. IMHO, it's better to have some bugs with too little data, than no-one willing to add bugs as they are worried about being told off. The other option is to come on #openzaurus and ask whether anyone knows about said bugs, and if not, add the bugs.
Si