- I've owned a SL-5500 for three years now, and it's been a simply amazing little unit. With some SD to boost it's storage, and a swap file to boost it's "RAM", I have nothing bad to say about it, considering its age. I ran the screen on *minimum* brightness and routinely got 6-8 hrs of runtime, plus I have a spare battery, for another 6-8 hrs. Since the SL-5500 doesn't reboot on a battery change, that works like a charm.
- I put everything on Cricket: MySQL, Apache, KOPI (IDE), PIM/PE suite, Opie apps ... you name it, and sometime in the last three years I've installed it, it seems. Thought nothing of dropping to the command line and completely re-organizing the directories with symlinks to maximize internal storage, not something you can do with just *any* PDA. For it's time, Cricket was "the" PDA I've always looked for.
- I used Cricket to listen to MP3s all the time ... just blank the display and it easily runs for at least two full albums. Hours of Asteroids or Kpacman, command line stuff, etc, at low screen brightness. WiFi is a different story; I ran an hour or so typically, enough time for lunch at the local hotspot/cafe. (wink) MAME pegs the CPU the entire time a game is running, and it drains the battery in about two hours, but it also doesn't run well! (drops frames) I don't recall doing anything else with it that would push Cricket that hard for any length of time.
- The biggest thing you'll notice between the SL-5500 and the C-1000 screen is the resolution; the newer unit has four times as many pixels as the older one, so a lot more info fits on it. The other thing is the illumination ... it's just done a whole lot better on the newer one. But the screen is certainly usable, and was very high resolution for its day. That means even three years later it's not pathetically low. Battery drain from the lighting arrangement is its major drawback.
- Having said all that, I got a C-1000 two months ago. It is a wonderous machine!! I can mount the "ROM" in read-write mode and re-arrange things to my heart's content, which I've done. (wolfish grin) The display is awesome ... it washes out a bit in sunlight, but imho it's not nearly as bad as the SL-5500 did. The keyboard is significantly better ... and the battery life! Astounding! It seems like it runs forever by comparison. Hiroshi is everything I wanted Cricket to be, but the technology wasn't there three years ago. It's also expensive, even more than Cricket was three years ago, but you get what you pay for.
- If this is your initial foray into Linux PDAs, I'd go with the others' recommendation and get an SL-5500. It's easily an usable device, and there is still lots and lots of software available for it. I've got 607MB of it on my hard drive! (snicker) And they're much more cost-effective than a C-1000, particularly for someone on a limited budget.
- If you don't mind used, and circlip doesn't respond real soon, Cricket is for sale. See the "For Sale/Wanted" Forum for details...