tnx for the feedback hus...I spose having pdxarom & OZ at the same time would be too tricky, as they use diff kernels?
[div align=\"right\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
i guess so, i think there is no point to have pdaxrom and OZ in the same device, they almost identical and both have almost the same amount of feeds (both linux).
if you want to use the flash ram go for pdaxrom if you like OZ and don't care about the FLASH ram it's good too.
what's remarkable in my opinion to have pdaxrom (kernel 2.6) and OpenBSD, first you will use the flash ram with pdaxrom, 2nd you will use for example 1gb of HD for linux and the rest for OpenBSD.
and BTW, lately i found pdaxrom beta4 really stable enough to have in c3200 also good feeds for it, these two feeds more than enough check:
[a href=\"http://mail.pdaxrom.org/download/1.1.0beta4/Zaurus-Cxx00/feed/]http://mail.pdaxrom.org/download/1.1.0beta...rus-Cxx00/feed/[/url]
http://mail.pdaxrom.org/contrib/Xromer/Beta4/i have used firefox with no problems and really fast with it, in another hand OZ hentges looks orginized and clean but really slow and to start firefox u gotta have time to wait
IMO to have pdaxrom+OpenBSD gonna be great to suck sl-c3200 resources lets hope that OpenBSD dev team release a loader for 2.6 kernel.