if X works-- please post a screenshot!
(and a few words comparing it to OZ or PdaX? if it isn't too much to ask...)
[div align=\"right\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
ss01.png - icewm and GTKTerm2
ss02.png - fbreader (sorry book in cyrillic )
ss03.png - zbedic dictionary
ss04.png - gaim IM ( again with cyrillic )
ss05.png - gnome-obex-send (choose device)
ss06.png - gnome-obex-send (sending file)
ss07.png - gnome-obex-server (incoming obex msg)
1. Both OZ and pdaXrom compiled without EABI.
That's why armel applications work faster.
2. It's Debian. It's means "apt" works correct.
No need manually check package depends,
easy compile packages.
3. I hope armel will be Debian official arch.
I also tested angstrom project:
[a href=\"http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/]http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/[/url]
It also use libc 2.5 and compiled with EABI
But it use ipkg packages. Its cause a lot of problems.
Only one angstrom project advantage I see
It use NAND as rootfs. And I can eject SD on fly.
But it also cause problem with busybox
UNIX utilitis in busybox are not full-value.
My choice is lost NAND and don't eject SD.