I have been contributing to and being part of the Opie project since its beginning, though I have quit a while ago.
The OpieII tree has nothing to do with Opie I except its name and its origin.
and a few developers.
The reason why Opie(I) had been forked once was because it was not possible to get community control over Qtopia. TrollTech owns it and any improvements one would like to see to be done must make ther way through the the TT processes. There is nothing wrong with that except that part of this process is that TT is the the only one who decides what is an improvement worth including or not and that due to the dual licensing scheme the developer of the code in question gives up all his rights on his intellectual property and transfers them to TT.
There had been several dicussions and meeting with the TT management and developers but none of those solved this issue.
An issue which remains even with Opie II.
For a developer this is disappointing because the chances that his work is rejected by TT is high.
TT is a company with profit in mind so the rules are sometimes contradictory to the
pure open source approach.
Qtopia is "pure" open source, just no community development, which is why OpieII was started. Same reason as why Opie 1 was started.
Personally I doubt this. To have a PDA profile in the pipeline TT needs a potential customer for a Linux PDA. I have not seen arising such one lately, instead the phone/smart phone market is increased a lot.
What are requestin is something to keep your Z alive but this is propably not on the official TT whish list.
OpieII/Qtopia 4 can be used on any device. There is no difference between the phone profile, and a pda profile.
I have been working on Qtopia 4/OpieII for Zaurus, but my time is stretched thin, especially having a young son who does not allow me to have much time to myself. Development of this should increase in the coming months, as I am changing to Software Engineer in the hardware group, instead of doing community management/marketing work.