OESF | ELSI | pdaXrom | OpenZaurus | Zaurus Themes | Community Links | Ibiblio

IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> A Big Problem... (deleted)
lardman
post May 10 2006, 02:22 AM
Post #46





Group: Members
Posts: 4,515
Joined: 25-October 03
From: Bath, UK
Member No.: 464



QUOTE
If someone REALLY thinks that pdaXrom should be moved over to the OE system, then it seems to me, since all of the source is there in the open, they should just start doing it. I mean, why not one more splinter? Take pdaXrom, port it to OE, make it work, prove to all of us that it works better, and if it really does do everything we want, then we'll come over to your camp.


Indeed, this is a thought that I'd had, now I just need some spare time. With that said, that spare time would be better spent improving OZ (perhaps using some of the pdaX patches, etc.), rather than trying to re-implement pdaX from scratch.

QUOTE
Sash does not want to use OE, and there really is no reason to push him to.


Yes, I agree. The point of this entire thread (at least the current part of the topic anyway), imho, is to say that that as there are so few of us, we ought to work together. One way to improve productivity would be for everyone to have the same build system, however there are probably other ways.

QUOTE
Honestly, in five years, most of us will have a new PDA, so delaying development of our working platform for infrastructure changes is not very appealing when what we have works so well for us.

As for OE. I think Mickey's goal is to have a system that we can be using on our new PDA's in five years too. I just wish that some of the OE guys could sit back and let that be their vindication, rather poking at us pdaXrom users now.


Fair point.

Anyway, I don't see anything changing regarding the usage of the build systems, so we may as well draw this (part of the) thread to a close and hopefully stop sniping at one another.

Cheers,


Si
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mickeyl
post May 10 2006, 02:45 AM
Post #47





Group: Members
Posts: 1,497
Joined: 12-November 03
From: Germany
Member No.: 907



clofland put it pretty well, amen to that.

QUOTE
As for OE. I think Mickey's goal is to have a system that we can be using on our new PDA's in five years too. I just wish that some of the OE guys could sit back and let that be their vindication, rather poking at us pdaXrom users now.


Heh, right. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sashz
post May 10 2006, 04:29 AM
Post #48





Group: Members
Posts: 388
Joined: 7-December 03
Member No.: 1,058



QUOTE(Mickeyl @ May 10 2006, 02:45 AM)
clofland put it pretty well, amen to that.

QUOTE
As for OE. I think Mickey's goal is to have a system that we can be using on our new PDA's in five years too. I just wish that some of the OE guys could sit back and let that be their vindication, rather poking at us pdaXrom users now.


Heh, right. smile.gif
*



so new features will come to OE after 5year preparing?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lardman
post May 10 2006, 05:19 AM
Post #49





Group: Members
Posts: 4,515
Joined: 25-October 03
From: Bath, UK
Member No.: 464



biggrin.gif

Note the 'too' wink.gif

Si
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amrein
post Jul 24 2006, 06:43 AM
Post #50





Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 20-February 04
Member No.: 1,950



http://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=3040

Still no go ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th May 2015 - 01:18 AM